Saturday 18 August 2012

2011-12 Match Reports CCFC v WEST HAM


3.5.2012

Play Off Semi Final

CCFC 0 v 2 WEST HAM

The Preamble Ramble...
As Chelsea were making their way to an unlikely Champions League final the TV pundits were suggesting that their victory against all odds was ‘fate’ ;as if their passage to the final was granted by divine providence, the act of a beneficent god. Well, it’s possible I suppose but only if the Omnipotent One is a Bayern fan out to prove a point to the Special One. I tend to favour the ‘cock-up’ theory ahead of conspiracy or supernatural intervention.

It wasn’t always the case though. I used to believe in the potency of superstition, convinced that outcomes were directly influenced by the unlikeliest of events. Back in the mid seventies when we were pushing for promotion from the old Division 3, standing on the Bob Bank with Dad and his friends, when ‘Uncle’ Des passed the wine gums around I knew that if I pulled out a black one 3 points were guaranteed. And the chances of us getting promoted were directly influenced by my ability to sing the whole of Bohemian Rhapsody in my head including the guitar solo and the operatic bits without making a mistake. It seemed to work as we were duly promoted in ‘76.

Footballers are notorious for their superstitious traits:
Milan’s Gattuso prepares for every game by reading Dostoevsky on the loo. Presumably ‘The Idiot’.
David James refuses to speak to anyone from Friday night through till the end of the game. His England colleagues often reacted likewise after the game.
Sergio Goycochea, the former Argentina goalkeeper had a legendary routine for facing penalties which involved him urinating on the pitch.
Adrian Mutu, the former Chelsea striker sacked by the club following a failed drugs test and ordered to repay the club £17m for breach of contract, believes he can only perform well on the pitch if he wears his underpants inside out. What is he ON?
Superstitions can get out of hand. The coach of the Zimbabwean side Midlands Portland Cement sent his squad of 17 players into the crocodile-crowded Zambezi River in a ritual cleansing ceremony, intended to restore their harmony ahead of their next game. Only 16 of his players emerged minutes later. They lost their next match.

So as we prepare for our third successive season of Play-Offs heartbreak what can we expect? I think it’s probably more helpful to look at the stats rather than rely on superstition to get a realistic assessment of our chances. A glance at the current form table shows us tucked in nicely behind the Hammers in third place, both teams having won 4 and drawn 2. Historically in all games since we first met in 1920 we have won 7, lost 8 and drawn 6 of the home fixtures against the bubble blowers. So far so-so. On the only occasion where we have contested a two-legged affair, in the League Cup in 1966 we lost 3-10 on aggregate. Ah, not so good. Clearly current form is the best guide.

In any case, Chelsea’s victory proved more than anything that superstition and statistics are no match for tactical nous, preparation and belief. A large slice of luck will also play its part. But if all else fails it might be time to pass round the wine gums.

Disappointingly as we took our seats it was clear that the anticipated ‘full house’ was not quite going to be realised, despite the return from exile of one of Ninian Park’s favourite sons, former Grange End acolyte and the man responsible for three generations of abject sporting misery, the Thomas clan patriarch; the one they call ‘Gramps’. Anticipating the requirement for supernatural intervention he’d come equipped with his ‘lucky’ bobble hat.

(As the game was televised ‘live’ I should emphasise that the following report is purely subjective, an honest ‘view from the terraces’ unfettered by forensic TV punditry and does not necessarily accord with the facts.)
We started well and after five minutes had the game in the bag and were looking forward to another stop off at Costa Coffee on Beaconsfield High Street. Fantasy football. ‘Pop!’ I hear the sound of bubbles forever bursting.

That didn’t last long as The Garnetts stormed back into the game. With less than 10 minutes gone Vaz Te collected the ball out wide, drifted past Blake deputising for the injured McNaughton and sent a curling cross over Turner to Collison who dispatched the ball past Marshall at the second attempt. 1-0. A soft goal celebrated to the sound of fallen crests.

The goal knocked the stuffing and any self-belief out of our lot as we continually gave away possession allowing their midfield to dominate. Perhaps it’s unfair to single out one individual but the timid, ponderous, clueless midfield chump formerly known as Peter Whittingham was having a stinker. As the relentless claret and blue tide threatened again and again the hope was to hold out until half time and take the opportunity to regroup. It wasn’t to be. 

After 42 minutes the ball fell to Collison just outside the box and he took full advantage of our failure to close him down, letting fly with a screamer that took a deflection past the marooned Marshall. 2-0. Another poorly defended goal, celebrated to the sound of 20,000 hearts sinking.

The second half saw an improvement and we carved out a number of decent chances. Miller, Hudson, Mason and Earnshaw went close but there was to be no cigar. We left, deflated and resigned to our May Day Bank Holiday fate. Instead of the hoped for ‘See you at Wembley’ smiles and back-slaps it was ‘Have a good summer’ scowls and shoulder shrugs.

It might be a bit premature to conduct the post mortem as the patient isn’t technically dead but it is at best in a persistent vegetative state and there is no moral imperative to postpone the inevitable. Looked at objectively we’ve had a decent season again but have fallen at the last hurdle. Again. So what might have turned a relatively successful campaign into a triumphant one? Where did it all go, if not wrong, then not quite right?
·       
       Failure to capitalise on our promising start to the season. Amongst much talk of ‘over-achieving’ the fact is that we were making steady progress with a small squad of solid but unspectacular journeymen and unproven talent.
·         Failure to buy a proven striker and a decent wide man in January.
·         Failure to get a proven striker and a decent wide man on loan in February.
·         Few options on the bench.
·         The Carling Cup run.
·         Failure to win the Carling Cup.
·         A shortage of wine gums.
·  
So Malky claims that it’s not all over (bless him) and that ‘2-0 is a dangerous score’. Perhaps he’s right. Perhaps Big Sam is even now castigating his charges for their failure to secure an honourable draw. I’d like to think we can rely on Malky’s tactical nous and preparations to turn things around but I can’t help thinking we’re going to need all the help we can get so I’ll be watching the game stroking a black cat in the company of a chimney sweep sitting on a bed of four leaf clovers and rabbit’s feet. That ought to do it. ‘Wem-ber-ley, Wem-ber-ley...’

No comments:

Post a Comment